Tour Y22 Golden
- Good data fit
- Specs Only
- B
- 13 source records
4 signals across 1 sources (Medium)
Mast Tour Y22 Golden vs EZ Tattoo P2S
A structured side-by-side profile for Mast Tour Y22 Golden vs EZ Tattoo P2S, built from indexed specs, seller records, source coverage, and issue-signal data.
This is a data comparison, not a hands-on lab test unless a machine is explicitly marked as tested.
Profile snapshot
P2S
- Good data fit
- Data Profile
- B
- 13 source records
3 signals across 2 sources (Medium)
Use-case fit
EZ Tattoo P2S
Stroke reach, hit signal, and power stability.
Mast Tour Y22 Golden
Weight, control, and smoother lower-stroke fit.
EZ Tattoo P2S
Stroke reach, hit signal, and power stability for packing.
Key differences
9 differing data points found in the current profiles.
Stroke
- Tour Y22 Golden
- 3
- P2S
- 3.5
Needle Depth
- Tour Y22 Golden
- Check specs
- P2S
- 0-4.5
Weight
- Tour Y22 Golden
- 138g
- P2S
- 197g
Voltage
- Tour Y22 Golden
- 5-12V
- P2S
- 5-9V
Runtime
- Tour Y22 Golden
- 6 h
- P2S
- 5 h
Motor Speed
- Tour Y22 Golden
- 10,000 RPM
- P2S
- 10,800 RPM
Decision snapshot
Tour Y22 Golden
138g
Lower listed weight can matter during longer sessions.
6 h
Weight, control, and smoother lower-stroke fit.
Pen
Wireless
P2S
Good data fit
Closest overall data-match estimate in this comparison.
$139
Stroke reach, hit signal, and power stability.
Stroke reach, hit signal, and power stability for packing.
Pen
Side-by-side specs
| Spec | Tour Y22 Golden | P2S |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Pen | Pen |
| Power | Wireless | Wireless |
| Stroke System | Fixed stroke | Fixed stroke |
| Stroke | 3 | 3.5 |
| Stroke Step | Not listed | Not listed |
| Needle Depth | Check specs | 0-4.5 |
| Weight | 138g | 197g |
| Voltage | 5-12V | 5-9V |
| Runtime | 6 h | 5 h |
| Charge Time | 2 h | 2 h |
| Motor | Coreless | Coreless |
| Motor Size | Not listed | Not listed |
| Motor Speed | 10,000 RPM | 10,800 RPM |
| Frequency | 75-180 Hz | 60-160 Hz |
| Best Price | $149 | $139 |
| Sellers | 3 | 3 |
| Source Coverage | B | B |
| Reported Issue Signals | 4 signals across 1 sources (Medium) | 3 signals across 2 sources (Medium) |
Continue your research
Related categories
Compare next
Mast Archer vs Dragonhawk Mast Tour Y22 Wireless Tattoo Machine Golden →Mast Archer vs P2s →P2s vs Ez P3 Pro Adjustable Stroke Wireless Battery Tattoo Pen Machine →P2s vs Ez P3 Pro Turbo →P2s vs Ez P6 →Ez Filter Freedom Wireless Battery Tattoo Pen Machine vs P2s →Evotech Pro Pwm Speed Adjustment Wireless Battery Tattoo Pen Machine vs P2s →P2s vs Ez Portex Generation 2s P2s 4 0mm Wireless Battery Tattoo Pen Machine Gradient Color →
Sources behind this comparison
Open the underlying profile or a directly indexed source before treating a difference as final.
Tour Y22 Golden
Latest indexed check: Jul 4, 2026
Dragonhawk Mast Tour Y22 Golden motor speed RPM syncOpen source ↗Dragonhawk / Mast OfficialOpen source ↗Dragonhawk official image OCROpen source ↗
Full profile →P2S
Latest indexed check: Jul 4, 2026
EZ Tattoo P2S frequency Hz syncOpen source ↗EZ Tattoo P2S motor speed RPM syncOpen source ↗Official reference pageOpen source ↗
Full profile →Creator / Owner Review Reference Comparison
Similar Profiles to Check Next
Reading the comparison
EZ Tattoo P2S
Closest overall data-match estimate in this comparison.
Mast Tour Y22 Golden
Lower reported issue signal among the compared profiles.
Mast Tour Y22 Golden
Lower listed weight can matter during longer sessions.
Mast Tour Y22 Golden
More source records make the profile easier to verify.
FAQ
Which machine has the closer data fit in Mast Tour Y22 Golden vs EZ Tattoo P2S?
EZ Tattoo P2S currently has the closer data-fit estimate. Treat this as a research signal and still compare weight, stroke, seller records, and issue coverage.
Is this Mast Tour Y22 Golden vs EZ Tattoo P2S comparison hands-on tested?
No. It is a structured data comparison unless an individual machine is explicitly marked as hands-on tested.
How should issue signals be read?
Issue signals are public-source research signals, not verified defect rates. Use them as prompts for deeper source checking.