Archer S
- Good data fit
- Specs Only
- B
- 13 source records
4 signals across 1 sources (Medium)
Mast Archer S vs CNC Tattoo E77
A structured side-by-side profile for Mast Archer S vs CNC Tattoo E77, built from indexed specs, seller records, source coverage, and issue-signal data.
This is a data comparison, not a hands-on lab test unless a machine is explicitly marked as tested.
Profile snapshot
E77
- Good data fit
- Specs Only
- B
- 14 source records
4 signals across 2 sources (Low)
Use-case fit
Mast Archer S
Stroke reach, hit signal, and power stability.
Mast Archer S
Weight, control, and smoother lower-stroke fit.
Mast Archer S
Stroke reach, hit signal, and power stability for packing.
Key differences
10 differing data points found in the current profiles.
Stroke
- Archer S
- 4.2
- E77
- 3.5
Weight
- Archer S
- 169g
- E77
- 248g
Voltage
- Archer S
- 4-12V
- E77
- 5-12V
Runtime
- Archer S
- 6 h
- E77
- 3 h
Charge Time
- Archer S
- 0.83 h
- E77
- 2 h
Motor
- Archer S
- Brushless
- E77
- Coreless
Decision snapshot
Archer S
Good data fit
Closest overall data-match estimate in this comparison.
169g
Lower listed weight can matter during longer sessions.
6 h
$209
Stroke reach, hit signal, and power stability.
E77
14 source records
More source records make the profile easier to verify.
Pen
Wireless
3.5
248g
Side-by-side specs
| Spec | Archer S | E77 |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Pen | Pen |
| Power | Wireless | Wireless |
| Stroke System | Fixed stroke | Fixed stroke |
| Stroke | 4.2 | 3.5 |
| Stroke Step | Not listed | Not listed |
| Needle Depth | 0-4.5 | 0-4.5 |
| Weight | 169g | 248g |
| Voltage | 4-12V | 5-12V |
| Runtime | 6 h | 3 h |
| Charge Time | 0.83 h | 2 h |
| Motor | Brushless | Coreless |
| Motor Size | Not listed | Not listed |
| Motor Speed | 11,500 RPM | 10,000 RPM |
| Frequency | 75-190 Hz | 83-199 Hz |
| Best Price | $209 | $209.98 |
| Sellers | 3 | 3 |
| Source Coverage | B | B |
| Reported Issue Signals | 4 signals across 1 sources (Medium) | 4 signals across 2 sources (Low) |
Continue your research
Brand profiles
Related categories
Sources behind this comparison
Open the underlying profile or a directly indexed source before treating a difference as final.
Archer S
Latest indexed check: Jul 4, 2026
Dragonhawk Mast Archer S motor speed RPM syncOpen source ↗Detail gap resolutionOpen source ↗Official product pageOpen source ↗
Full profile →E77
Latest indexed check: Jul 4, 2026
CNC Tattoo E77 frequency Hz syncOpen source ↗CNC E77 manual complaint evidenceOpen source ↗CNC Tattoo official spec candidateOpen source ↗
Full profile →Creator / Owner Review Reference Comparison
No curated creator or owner review references are attached to this exact comparison yet. Only strict model-matched references are shown.
Similar Profiles to Check Next
Reading the comparison
Mast Archer S
Closest overall data-match estimate in this comparison.
CNC Tattoo E77
Lower reported issue signal among the compared profiles.
Mast Archer S
Lower listed weight can matter during longer sessions.
CNC Tattoo E77
More source records make the profile easier to verify.
FAQ
Which machine has the closer data fit in Mast Archer S vs CNC Tattoo E77?
Mast Archer S currently has the closer data-fit estimate. Treat this as a research signal and still compare weight, stroke, seller records, and issue coverage.
Is this Mast Archer S vs CNC Tattoo E77 comparison hands-on tested?
No. It is a structured data comparison unless an individual machine is explicitly marked as hands-on tested.
How should issue signals be read?
Issue signals are public-source research signals, not verified defect rates. Use them as prompts for deeper source checking.