P60
- Good data fit
- Specs Only
- B
- 15 source records
7 signals across 1 sources (Low)
Mast P60 vs CNC Tattoo E77
A structured side-by-side profile for Mast P60 vs CNC Tattoo E77, built from indexed specs, seller records, source coverage, and issue-signal data.
This is a data comparison, not a hands-on lab test unless a machine is explicitly marked as tested.
Profile snapshot
E77
- Good data fit
- Specs Only
- B
- 14 source records
4 signals across 2 sources (Low)
Use-case fit
CNC Tattoo E77
Stroke reach, hit signal, and power stability.
Mast P60
Weight, control, and smoother lower-stroke fit.
CNC Tattoo E77
Stroke reach, hit signal, and power stability for packing.
Key differences
11 differing data points found in the current profiles.
Stroke System
- P60
- Adjustable stroke
- E77
- Fixed stroke
Stroke
- P60
- 2.2 / 2.5 / 2.7 / 2.9 / 3.2
- E77
- 3.5
Needle Depth
- P60
- Check specs
- E77
- 0-4.5
Weight
- P60
- 121g
- E77
- 248g
Voltage
- P60
- 4-10V
- E77
- 5-12V
Runtime
- P60
- 5 h
- E77
- 3 h
Decision snapshot
P60
Good data fit
Closest overall data-match estimate in this comparison.
121g
Lower listed weight can matter during longer sessions.
5 h
$195 - $259
15 source records
More source records make the profile easier to verify.
E77
Stroke reach, hit signal, and power stability.
Stroke reach, hit signal, and power stability for packing.
Pen
Wireless
3.5
Side-by-side specs
| Spec | P60 | E77 |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Pen | Pen |
| Power | Wireless | Wireless |
| Stroke System | Adjustable stroke | Fixed stroke |
| Stroke | 2.2 / 2.5 / 2.7 / 2.9 / 3.2 | 3.5 |
| Stroke Step | Not listed | Not listed |
| Needle Depth | Check specs | 0-4.5 |
| Weight | 121g | 248g |
| Voltage | 4-10V | 5-12V |
| Runtime | 5 h | 3 h |
| Charge Time | 2.5 h | 2 h |
| Motor | Coreless | Coreless |
| Motor Size | Not listed | Not listed |
| Motor Speed | 11,000 RPM | 10,000 RPM |
| Frequency | 73-183 Hz | 83-199 Hz |
| Best Price | $195 - $259 | $209.98 |
| Sellers | 3 | 3 |
| Source Coverage | B | B |
| Reported Issue Signals | 7 signals across 1 sources (Low) | 4 signals across 2 sources (Low) |
Continue your research
Brand profiles
Related categories
Sources behind this comparison
Open the underlying profile or a directly indexed source before treating a difference as final.
P60
Latest indexed check: Jul 4, 2026
Detail gap resolutionOpen source ↗Official product pageOpen source ↗Dragonhawk / Mast official spec candidateOpen source ↗
Full profile →E77
Latest indexed check: Jul 4, 2026
CNC Tattoo E77 frequency Hz syncOpen source ↗CNC E77 manual complaint evidenceOpen source ↗CNC Tattoo official spec candidateOpen source ↗
Full profile →Creator / Owner Review Reference Comparison
No curated creator or owner review references are attached to this exact comparison yet. Only strict model-matched references are shown.
Similar Profiles to Check Next
Reading the comparison
Mast P60
Closest overall data-match estimate in this comparison.
Mast P60
Lower reported issue signal among the compared profiles.
Mast P60
Lower listed weight can matter during longer sessions.
Mast P60
More source records make the profile easier to verify.
FAQ
Which machine has the closer data fit in Mast P60 vs CNC Tattoo E77?
Mast P60 currently has the closer data-fit estimate. Treat this as a research signal and still compare weight, stroke, seller records, and issue coverage.
Is this Mast P60 vs CNC Tattoo E77 comparison hands-on tested?
No. It is a structured data comparison unless an individual machine is explicitly marked as hands-on tested.
How should issue signals be read?
Issue signals are public-source research signals, not verified defect rates. Use them as prompts for deeper source checking.